Teach-In on campus at University of Tulsa (T.U.) | first major glitch with Ning events

[Tony Nuspl]

Unfortunately, the event posted to Ning for yesterday's teach-in no longer appears on the site. I did post the event, and sent out invitations to all TPF members subscribed here. If you rec'd the invitation through Ning, please let me know.

This was the line up, last night, on campus at. T.U.

"Teach In" on Afghanistan
Tuesday Dec. 8th, 2009
in Chapman Lecture Hall, University of Tulsa
beginning at 7:00 pm

presenters:

Jeremy Kuzmarov (T.U. History) : The history of U.S. involvement in Afghanistan and the wider region
Drew Wood (T.U. History) : The costs and projected costs of the war(s) and present proposed buildup in Afghanistan
Micah Stubbs (Students for Liberty, T.U. chapter): The status of opium production in Afghanistan
Mark Brewin (T.U. Communications) : The problems of media politics/coverage of U.S. foreign affairs
Tony Nuspl (President, Tulsa Peace Fellowship): A counter-argument to the Afghanistan escalation

A forum for faculty and for student input/discusssion. Others are welcome as well.

The event was put together on short notice, but there were about a dozen people there for the teach-in on Afghanistan. Everyone in attendance stayed until the end, wrapping up about 9:30pm. So it was a pretty long and intensive seminar. I think we may have changed some people's minds!

Drew also announced plans for another such teach-in in January, at.T.U., and Micah said that he'd be screening the documentary "Rethink Afghanistan" in full, also in January, also at T.U. As a teaser for Thursday evening screening of the film at the public library, Hardesty Regional Library, 91st & Memorial, we screened one segment of that documentary last night, specifically, section 6 on "Civilian casualties" --which makes a moral argument against the war that you rarely see in the FSM (fawning state media). There were three members Historians Against the Wars there, including me. I distributed the HAW Statement on Afghanistan. Here it is:

Historians Against the War (HAW)
Statement on Afghanistan
October 2008

After much discussion, and helpful input from HAW members who responded to the initial tentative draft, the Steering Committee of Historians Against the War has adopted the following resolution regarding the US/NATO war in Afghanistan. We encourage members to consider including the Afghanistan war in any teach-ins or forums that are involved in. We will also post Afghanistan materials on our web site (suggestions are welcome at [e-mail]).

1. Whatever views we hold on the initial US military intervention in Afghanistan in the wake of the September 11 attacks in the US, it is now clear that the US/NATO presence in this country has become an occupation, increasingly resented and opposed by large sections of the population.

2. Despite the relief that met removal of the totalitarian Taliban government by US and NATO forces, the new government, chosen under the direction of the Bush administration, has distanced itself from the people, is rent with corruption, and barely governs anything. Outside of Kabul, warlords and criminal elements operate with impunity, the opium trade grows, violence -- including violence by the occupation forces -- proliferates, and the Taliban is resurgent.

3. The support for fundamentalist warlords and the corrupt Karzai regime demonstrate that the purpose of US policy in Afghanistan is not to support the self-determination of the Afghan people, but to extend the bankrupt global war against terror deeper into Central Asia, and to strengthen US geopolitical power in this region. The US/NATO war on Afghanistan is not a "good war" in contrast to the "bad war" on Iraq.

4. The current consensus in higher political circles, including both major party candidates for president, that the war in Afghanistan must be escalated will only deepen the regional crisis and suffering of the Afghan people. The historical experience of other outside powers trying to control Afghanistan (most spectacularly, the Soviet Union from 1979 to 1989, invading from next door over a wide common border) suggests that even a greatly escalated US/NATO war effort will only multiply the deaths and the suffering.

5. The US and NATO should immediately begin withdrawing their military and political assets from Afghanistan so that the Afghan people can have room to decide their own future. Continued US/NATO action in the country is a large part of the problem and cannot be the solution.

6. We call for regional agreement among Afghanistan's neighbors to guarantee Afghan stability, to preserve the ethnic and religious diversity of the country, to assure the full participation of women in social life, and to provide space for all of the people of Afghanistan to fully exercise their right to self-determination.

www.historiansagainstwar.org