Tulsa Peace Fellowship

There never was a good war or a bad peace. ~Ben Franklin

  LANL is closed tomorrow.  They say the Las Conchas fire is estimated to be 49,000 acres – more than the 47,000 acres burned by the May 2000 Cerro Grande fire.  See http://www.lanl.gov/

We are grateful for the excellent coverage of the fire by the KSFR News Team.  You can hear them at http://www.ksfr.org.

2.  Los Alamos County has declared a state of emergency and ordered mandatory evacuations for the Los Alamos townsite, but not White Rock.  a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.lamonitor.com/">http://www.lamonitor.com/ >  and a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://nmfireinfo.wordpress.com/">http://nmfireinfo.wordpress.com > and a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.losalamosnm.us/Pages/Home.aspx">http://www.losalamosnm.us/Pages/Home.aspx >.  There’s information about evacuation locations.  “
The Big Rock Santa Claran Event Center [in Espanola] is open as a shelter for those who are voluntarily evacuating with no accommodations.”

Additional information is available at http://wildfiretoday.com/2011/06/27/new-fire-near-los-alamos-burns-43000-acres-in-less-than-24-hours/

3.  People in surrounding communities should prepare to evacuate; gas up your vehicles now.  Pregnant women and families with small children should take a precautionary step and evacuate now.  

Our main concern is that the Las Conchas fire is about 3 1/2 miles from Area G, the dumpsite that has been in operation since the late 1950s/early 1960s.  There are 20,000 to 30,000 55-gallons drums of plutonium contaminated waste (containing solvents, chemicals and toxic materials) sitting in fabric tents above ground.  These drums are destined for WIPP.  

To view the fire and Area G from satellite, go to the Nuclear Watch New Mexico blog to learn how to use Google Earth and the US Forest Service information to keep track of the fire.  http://www.nukewatch.org/watchblog/?p=838

Views: 52

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Good segment on Democracy Now! about the significance of a fire at Los Alamos nuke facility:

Greg Mello of the Los Alamos Study Group, reports:

Most people probably don’t know but in an effort to get the new START treaty ratified in the Senate, the White House made a lot of promises to Republicans, including building a new factory here at Los Alamos for plutonium warhead cores, called "pits." That’s this $6 billion building in a complex of other large supporting facilities. There is a new factory of comparable size proposed in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, which is moving along, as well. And there is a factory under construction in Kansas City.

Recently, the Republicans, of all people—in the House of Representatives, the Republicans in the House Appropriations Committee suggested that some of these projects were not cost-effective, that this particular project at Los Alamos, where they would bring what one administrator called the nation’s "storehouse of plutonium," was premature and needed further study before it could be funded.

We have more than probably 2,000 nuclear weapons a few miles from us here in the studio, and Los Alamos is becoming a very large manufacturing maquiladora.



Also see press release from the Los Alamos Study Group, that asks some very pointed questions:

Stepping back from the immediately-unfolding drama, we need to ask some serious larger questions, such as:

  • The Obama Administration proposes to build a huge plutonium warhead core ("pit") factory complex in Los Alamos, costing on the order of $6 billion dollars.  According to congressional testimony of Donald Cook, Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs in the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) this spring, this facility would house "the nation's storehouse of plutonium."  Is any part of this really necessary?  We think not.  (See Reasons Not to Build, or to Delay CMRR-NF, May 22, 2011).  Does it really contribute to national security, or is the present fire yet another reminder that the nature of national security is changing before our eyes?

  • Assuming such a capability were necessary, is this remote site -- prone to recurrent wildfire, physically remote, crossed by faults known to produce accelerations comparable to those recently experienced at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear station -- really the right place for a plutonium manufacturing center?



Reply to Discussion




Who We Are - The TPF Steering Committee

TPF is a registered non-profit organization in the State of Oklahoma, a non-partisan and non-sectarian civic sector organization, devoted to peace, social uplift, and nonviolence.

16 discussions

Book Reviews, Film Reviews, Review Articles

TPF members post reviews, as part of a previously organized monthly book/dvd exchange or other occasional reading circles

10 discussions

Peace Building, Mutual Aid, and Local Grassroots Community Efforts

People to come together to solve shared challenges at the grassroots level. This discussion forum is for events, plans, strategies and tactics to support sustainability and justice, including mutual aid and self-bootstrapping. Put your reviews of peace-promoting games and nonviolent disobedience training here as well.

15 discussions

© 2024   Created by Tony Nuspl.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service